Our own law commission?
OVER the past year, there have been calls for law reform in several areas of law.
There have been suggestions that the Films Act needs to be updated to be in synch with our developing society and its norms. Arguments have also been put forward that various aspects of our criminal law be reviewed so as to give better rights to a defendant, especially one arrested by mistake or through entrapment.
For example, lawyer Thomas Koshy argued in Today recently on the need to provide a wrongfully accused person the right to recover his legal costs from the state.
These aspects of law reform could have a profound impact on the legal rights, liabilities and duties of many, if approved by Parliament.
Yet, these calls have been met with silence from the two bodies that bear the important burden of law reform.
The primary entity for law reform in Singapore is the Law Reform and Revision Division (LRRD) of the Attorney-General's Chambers, whose two-fold mission is "to review and reform the law to meet the needs of Singapore and its people in the 21st century" and to revise legislation "to consolidate, modernise and simplify them".
The secondary entity is the Law Reform Committee (LRC) of the Singapore Academy of Law, which makes recommendations to the Government on the need for legislation in any area of law; reviews any legislation before Parliament; and publishes selected reports available online.
Not many laymen seem to know of these two bodies. They seem to be...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home